On Wed, 8 May 2013, Parag Warudkar wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 8 May 2013, Christian König wrote:
>
> > If you want to hack a bit on it you could try commenting out the calls to
> > "radeon_set_uvd_clocks" in radeon_uvd.c. That should give you the default
> > clocks of 100Mhz, not enough for usable
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Parag Warudkar wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 8 May 2013, Christian K?nig wrote:
>
> > If you want to hack a bit on it you could try commenting out the calls to
> > "radeon_set_uvd_clocks" in radeon_uvd.c. That should give you the default
> > clocks of 100Mhz, not enough for usable
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Christian König wrote:
> Am 07.05.2013 23:13, schrieb Parag Warudkar:
> > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Christian König
> > wrote:
> > Without SUMO_uvd.bin - suspends fine and only wakes up when I want it to.
>
> Hui? Wait a second, the firmware doesn't work but still cau
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Christian K?nig wrote:
> Am 07.05.2013 23:13, schrieb Parag Warudkar:
> > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Christian K?nig
> > wrote:
> > Without SUMO_uvd.bin - suspends fine and only wakes up when I want it to.
>
> Hui? Wait a second, the firmware doesn't work but still cau
Am 07.05.2013 23:13, schrieb Parag Warudkar:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Christian K?nig
> wrote:
>
>> The patch shouldn't be necessary because just removing the firmware should
>> have pretty much the same effect.
> Soon distros will ship the UVD firmware by default and then users will
> n
Am 07.05.2013 23:13, schrieb Parag Warudkar:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Christian König wrote:
The patch shouldn't be necessary because just removing the firmware should
have pretty much the same effect.
Soon distros will ship the UVD firmware by default and then users will
need to manua
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Christian König wrote:
>
> The patch shouldn't be necessary because just removing the firmware should
> have pretty much the same effect.
Soon distros will ship the UVD firmware by default and then users will
need to manually remove it and then do the same with ev
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Christian K?nig
wrote:
>
> The patch shouldn't be necessary because just removing the firmware should
> have pretty much the same effect.
Soon distros will ship the UVD firmware by default and then users will
need to manually remove it and then do the same with e
Am 07.05.2013 09:02, schrieb Michel D?nzer:
> On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 19:11 -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote:
>> Apparently UVD doesn't yet work everywhere - so allow it to be
>> disabled. Shaves off some reboot and suspend/resume time on machines
>> where it doesn't work. Might be useful for problematic
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 19:11 -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> Apparently UVD doesn't yet work everywhere - so allow it to be
> disabled. Shaves off some reboot and suspend/resume time on machines
> where it doesn't work. Might be useful for problematic chips in the
> future as well.
>
> Patch attache
Am 07.05.2013 09:02, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 19:11 -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote:
Apparently UVD doesn't yet work everywhere - so allow it to be
disabled. Shaves off some reboot and suspend/resume time on machines
where it doesn't work. Might be useful for problematic chips in
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 19:11 -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> Apparently UVD doesn't yet work everywhere - so allow it to be
> disabled. Shaves off some reboot and suspend/resume time on machines
> where it doesn't work. Might be useful for problematic chips in the
> future as well.
>
> Patch attache
Apparently UVD doesn't yet work everywhere - so allow it to be
disabled. Shaves off some reboot and suspend/resume time on machines
where it doesn't work. Might be useful for problematic chips in the
future as well.
Patch attached as well as inline below.
Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar
diff --gi
Apparently UVD doesn't yet work everywhere - so allow it to be
disabled. Shaves off some reboot and suspend/resume time on machines
where it doesn't work. Might be useful for problematic chips in the
future as well.
Patch attached as well as inline below.
Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar
diff --gi
14 matches
Mail list logo
