On 31/08/2021 14:35, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> The labels are misleading. Even though they are all prefixed with 'fail_'
> the success case also takes that path, and we should definitely not
> cleanup the job if it's been queued. While at it, let's rename those
> labels so we don't do the same mista
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 03:35:56PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> The labels are misleading. Even though they are all prefixed with 'fail_'
> the success case also takes that path, and we should definitely not
> cleanup the job if it's been queued. While at it, let's rename those
> labels so we do
The labels are misleading. Even though they are all prefixed with 'fail_'
the success case also takes that path, and we should definitely not
cleanup the job if it's been queued. While at it, let's rename those
labels so we don't do the same mistake again.
Fixes: 53516280cc38 ("drm/panfrost: use s
