On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 6:18 AM Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 2019-06-05 14:57, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 11:58 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >> But first of all, I remember Marek already submitted some patches long
> >> ago that extended struct driver with some flag that
Hi Rob,
On 2019-06-05 14:57, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 11:58 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> But first of all, I remember Marek already submitted some patches long
>> ago that extended struct driver with some flag that means that the
>> driver doesn't want the IOMMU to be attached before
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 11:58 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> But first of all, I remember Marek already submitted some patches long
> ago that extended struct driver with some flag that means that the
> driver doesn't want the IOMMU to be attached before probe. Why
> wouldn't that work? Sounds like a pe
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 7:48 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 11:25 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:40 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:35 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:29 PM Rob Herring wrote:
> > > >
> It shouldn't be a problem to hook something else up to the IOMMU
> subsystem. Hopefully it's something that people are going to standardize
> on.
>
> > 3) The automatic attach of DMA domain is also causing a different
> >problem for us on the GPU side, preventing us from supporting per-
> >
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 07:20:14AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 6:54 AM Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 06:20:57AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:14 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 03/06/2019 11:47, Rob Clark wrote:
>
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 6:54 AM Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 06:20:57AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:14 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > > On 03/06/2019 11:47, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 11:25 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 06:20:57AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:14 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
> >
> > On 03/06/2019 11:47, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 11:25 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:40 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> So,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 12:14:27PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 03/06/2019 11:47, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 11:25 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:40 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:35 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > > > >
>
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:14 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
>
> On 03/06/2019 11:47, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 11:25 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:40 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So, another case I've come across, on the display side.. I'm working
> >>> on
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:14 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 12:57 AM Vivek Gautam
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/3/2019 11:50 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:40 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > >> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:35 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > >>> On Tue, Dec 4,
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:47 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> If you (and a few others actors in the thread) want people to actually
> read what you wrote please follow proper mailing list ettiquette. I've
> given up on reading all the recent mails after scrolling through two
> pages of full quotes
If you (and a few others actors in the thread) want people to actually
read what you wrote please follow proper mailing list ettiquette. I've
given up on reading all the recent mails after scrolling through two
pages of full quotes.
On 03/06/2019 11:47, Rob Clark wrote:
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 11:25 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:40 AM Rob Clark wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:35 AM Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:29 PM Rob Herring wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:54 AM Rob Clark wrote:
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 11:25 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:40 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:35 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:29 PM Rob Herring wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:54 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 12:57 AM Vivek Gautam
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/3/2019 11:50 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:40 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:35 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:29 PM Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10
On 6/3/2019 11:50 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:40 AM Rob Clark wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:35 AM Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:29 PM Rob Herring wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:54 AM Rob Clark wrote:
This solves a problem we see with drm/msm, caused
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:40 AM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:35 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:29 PM Rob Herring wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:54 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This solves a problem we see with drm/msm, caused by gettin
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:35 AM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:29 PM Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:54 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > >
> > > This solves a problem we see with drm/msm, caused by getting
> > > iommu_dma_ops while we attach our own domain and manage i
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:29 PM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:54 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > This solves a problem we see with drm/msm, caused by getting
> > iommu_dma_ops while we attach our own domain and manage it directly at
> > the iommu API level:
> >
> > [00
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:54 AM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> This solves a problem we see with drm/msm, caused by getting
> iommu_dma_ops while we attach our own domain and manage it directly at
> the iommu API level:
>
> [0038] user address but active_mm is swapper
> Internal error: Oops:
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 7:56 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 7:45 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > On 01/12/2018 16:53, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > This solves a problem we see with drm/msm, caused by getting
> > > iommu_dma_ops while we attach our own domain and manage it
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 7:45 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 01/12/2018 16:53, Rob Clark wrote:
> > This solves a problem we see with drm/msm, caused by getting
> > iommu_dma_ops while we attach our own domain and manage it directly at
> > the iommu API level:
> >
> >[0038
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 7:45 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 01/12/2018 16:53, Rob Clark wrote:
> > This solves a problem we see with drm/msm, caused by getting
> > iommu_dma_ops while we attach our own domain and manage it directly at
> > the iommu API level:
> >
> >[0038
Hi Rob,
On 01/12/2018 16:53, Rob Clark wrote:
This solves a problem we see with drm/msm, caused by getting
iommu_dma_ops while we attach our own domain and manage it directly at
the iommu API level:
[0038] user address but active_mm is swapper
Internal error: Oops: 9605 [#
Hi Tomasz,
On 2018-12-03 01:10, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 8:54 AM Rob Clark wrote:
>> This solves a problem we see with drm/msm, caused by getting
>> iommu_dma_ops while we attach our own domain and manage it directly at
>> the iommu API level:
>>
>> [0038] user ad
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 8:54 AM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> This solves a problem we see with drm/msm, caused by getting
> iommu_dma_ops while we attach our own domain and manage it directly at
> the iommu API level:
>
> [0038] user address but active_mm is swapper
> Internal error: Oops:
This solves a problem we see with drm/msm, caused by getting
iommu_dma_ops while we attach our own domain and manage it directly at
the iommu API level:
[0038] user address but active_mm is swapper
Internal error: Oops: 9605 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 7 PID: 7
28 matches
Mail list logo