On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
>
> On Friday 20 July 2012 10:34:46 Rob Clark wrote:
>> thanks! I've pushed to a branch on my github tree, in case you want
>> to double check that I'm not missing anything:
>>
>> git://github.com/robclark/libdrm.git modetes
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
>
> On Friday 20 July 2012 10:34:46 Rob Clark wrote:
>> thanks! I've pushed to a branch on my github tree, in case you want
>> to double check that I'm not missing anything:
>>
>> git://github.com/robclark/libdrm.git modetes
Hi Rob,
On Friday 20 July 2012 10:34:46 Rob Clark wrote:
> thanks! I've pushed to a branch on my github tree, in case you want
> to double check that I'm not missing anything:
>
> git://github.com/robclark/libdrm.git modetest branch
>
> will do some sanity testing a bit later, and if that l
As the modeset test application is often referred to as an example of
the KMS API usage, move test pattern generation and buffer allocation to
a separate file to keep it simple and clear.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
---
tests/modetest/Makefile.am |2 +-
tests/modetest/buffers.c | 1021
Hi Rob,
On Friday 20 July 2012 10:34:46 Rob Clark wrote:
> thanks! I've pushed to a branch on my github tree, in case you want
> to double check that I'm not missing anything:
>
> git://github.com/robclark/libdrm.git modetest branch
>
> will do some sanity testing a bit later, and if that l
thanks! I've pushed to a branch on my github tree, in case you want
to double check that I'm not missing anything:
git://github.com/robclark/libdrm.git modetest branch
will do some sanity testing a bit later, and if that looks ok and no
one objects, I can push to fd.o
BR,
-R
On Fri, Jul 20,
