Hi Jesse
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jesse Barnes
wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:01:59 +0100
> David Herrmann wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Thierry
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
>> > wrote:
>> >> Due to the typo
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:54:11 +0100
David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi Jesse
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:01:59 +0100
> > David Herrmann wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Thierry
> >> >
> >> >
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:54:11 +0100
David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi Jesse
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:01:59 +0100
> > David Herrmann wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Thierry
> >> >
> >> >
Hi Jesse
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:01:59 +0100
> David Herrmann wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Thierry
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
>> > wrote:
>> >> Due to the typo,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:00:34PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
[...]
> Also ${} is pretty standard in makefiles, isn't it?
The curly braces are allowed and valid syntax, but I haven't seen many
uses of them. Historically only $() was a documented feature, while ${}
was accepted as equivalent but
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:00:34PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
[...]
> Also ${} is pretty standard in makefiles, isn't it?
The curly braces are allowed and valid syntax, but I haven't seen many
uses of them. Historically only $() was a documented feature, while ${}
was accepted as equivalent but
Thanks, David.
After "sudo apt-get install docbook-xsl" and configure the libdrm with
"--enable-manpages", I see the manpages generated.
Mark
On 01/20/2013 05:17 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi Mark
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Mark Zhang wrote:
>> Hi David:
>>
>> Sorry for jumping in. I
Hi David:
Sorry for jumping in. I pulled the ToT libdrm and it seems the manpages
will not be built("make html" does nothing), any suggestions?
P.S: I've installed xsltproc.
Mark
On 01/19/2013 12:01 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
> wrote:
>> Hi Thier
Hi Mark
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Mark Zhang wrote:
> Hi David:
>
> Sorry for jumping in. I pulled the ToT libdrm and it seems the manpages
> will not be built("make html" does nothing), any suggestions?
The manpages should be built automatically if you do "make". Or you
can try "make -C
Thanks, David.
After "sudo apt-get install docbook-xsl" and configure the libdrm with
"--enable-manpages", I see the manpages generated.
Mark
On 01/20/2013 05:17 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi Mark
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Mark Zhang wrote:
>> Hi David:
>>
>> Sorry for jumping in. I
Hi Mark
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Mark Zhang wrote:
> Hi David:
>
> Sorry for jumping in. I pulled the ToT libdrm and it seems the manpages
> will not be built("make html" does nothing), any suggestions?
The manpages should be built automatically if you do "make". Or you
can try "make -C
Hi David:
Sorry for jumping in. I pulled the ToT libdrm and it seems the manpages
will not be built("make html" does nothing), any suggestions?
P.S: I've installed xsltproc.
Mark
On 01/19/2013 12:01 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
> wrote:
>> Hi Thier
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
wrote:
> Hi Thierry
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
>> Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
>> tarball and cause make distcheck as well as builds from the tarball to
>> fail.
>>
>> Using $(
Hi Thierry
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
> tarball and cause make distcheck as well as builds from the tarball to
> fail.
>
> Using $() isn't strictly necessary but other variables and expressions
> use
Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
tarball and cause make distcheck as well as builds from the tarball to
fail.
Using $() isn't strictly necessary but other variables and expressions
use that variant already so it makes the usage consistent.
Signed-off-by: Thierry
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:01:59 +0100
David Herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
> wrote:
> > Hi Thierry
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
> > wrote:
> >> Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
> >> tarball and cause m
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:01:59 +0100
David Herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
> wrote:
> > Hi Thierry
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
> > wrote:
> >> Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
> >> tarball and cause m
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
wrote:
> Hi Thierry
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
>> Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
>> tarball and cause make distcheck as well as builds from the tarball to
>> fail.
>>
>> Using $(
Hi Thierry
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
> tarball and cause make distcheck as well as builds from the tarball to
> fail.
>
> Using $() isn't strictly necessary but other variables and expressions
> use
Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
tarball and cause make distcheck as well as builds from the tarball to
fail.
Using $() isn't strictly necessary but other variables and expressions
use that variant already so it makes the usage consistent.
Signed-off-by: Thierry
20 matches
Mail list logo
