Am Dienstag, den 02.09.2014, 09:00 -0300 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Philipp Zabel
> wrote:
> > Hi Fabio,
> >
> > Am Dienstag, den 02.09.2014, 00:37 -0300 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> >> From: Fabio Estevam
> >>
> >> Let's only define DEBUG for debugging
Hi Fabio,
Am Dienstag, den 02.09.2014, 00:37 -0300 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> From: Fabio Estevam
>
> Let's only define DEBUG for debugging purpose and not by default to avoid
> printing debugging message unnecessarily.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
> ---
> Russell,
>
> Are you still collect
Hi Philipp,
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 02.09.2014, 00:37 -0300 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
>> From: Fabio Estevam
>>
>> Let's only define DEBUG for debugging purpose and not by default to avoid
>> printing debugging message unnecessarily.
>>
From: Fabio Estevam
Let's only define DEBUG for debugging purpose and not by default to avoid
printing debugging message unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
---
Russell,
Are you still collecting ipu-v3 patches?
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl does not provide too many hints on who should
