Re: [PATCH] intel: Update i915_drm.h and correct misspelled caching

2013-08-19 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: > On 08/14/2013 01:19 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> AFAICS, there are more updates needed to be in sync with recent >> kernel-drm. >> >> I fell over the misspelling when digging into an issue in Linux-next. >> The spelling should be consistent in

[PATCH] intel: Update i915_drm.h and correct misspelled caching

2013-08-19 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: > On 08/14/2013 01:19 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> AFAICS, there are more updates needed to be in sync with recent >> kernel-drm. >> >> I fell over the misspelling when digging into an issue in Linux-next. >> The spelling should be consistent in

Re: [PATCH] intel: Update i915_drm.h and correct misspelled caching

2013-08-16 Thread Ian Romanick
On 08/14/2013 01:19 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: AFAICS, there are more updates needed to be in sync with recent kernel-drm. I fell over the misspelling when digging into an issue in Linux-next. The spelling should be consistent in kernel-drm, libdrm, intel-ddx, etc. Here, I had a look especially at t

[PATCH] intel: Update i915_drm.h and correct misspelled caching

2013-08-16 Thread Ian Romanick
On 08/14/2013 01:19 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > AFAICS, there are more updates needed to be in sync with recent kernel-drm. > > I fell over the misspelling when digging into an issue in Linux-next. > The spelling should be consistent in kernel-drm, libdrm, intel-ddx, etc. > Here, I had a look especial

[PATCH] intel: Update i915_drm.h and correct misspelled caching

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
AFAICS, there are more updates needed to be in sync with recent kernel-drm. I fell over the misspelling when digging into an issue in Linux-next. The spelling should be consistent in kernel-drm, libdrm, intel-ddx, etc. Here, I had a look especially at the defined macros (defines). Signed-off-by:

[PATCH] intel: Update i915_drm.h and correct misspelled caching

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
AFAICS, there are more updates needed to be in sync with recent kernel-drm. I fell over the misspelling when digging into an issue in Linux-next. The spelling should be consistent in kernel-drm, libdrm, intel-ddx, etc. Here, I had a look especially at the defined macros (defines). Signed-off-by: