On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:47:36AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Every access to either the GTT or CPU pointer is supposed to be
> proceeded by a set_domain ioctl so that GEM is able to manage the cache
> domains correctly and for the following access to be coherent. Of
> course, some people explici
Every access to either the GTT or CPU pointer is supposed to be
proceeded by a set_domain ioctl so that GEM is able to manage the cache
domains correctly and for the following access to be coherent. Of
course, some people explicitly want incoherent, non-blocking access
which is going to trigger war
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:47:36AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Every access to either the GTT or CPU pointer is supposed to be
> proceeded by a set_domain ioctl so that GEM is able to manage the cache
> domains correctly and for the following access to be coherent. Of
> course, some people explici
Every access to either the GTT or CPU pointer is supposed to be
proceeded by a set_domain ioctl so that GEM is able to manage the cache
domains correctly and for the following access to be coherent. Of
course, some people explicitly want incoherent, non-blocking access
which is going to trigger war
