Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] i915: Drop legacy execbuffer support

2021-03-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:31:33PM -0600, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On March 11, 2021 20:26:06 "Dixit, Ashutosh" wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:00:49 -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > > > libdrm has supported the newer execbuffer2 ioctl and using it by default > > > when it exists since

Re: [PATCH] i915: Drop legacy execbuffer support

2021-03-11 Thread Dixit, Ashutosh
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:31:33 -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On March 11, 2021 20:26:06 "Dixit, Ashutosh" wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:00:49 -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > libdrm has supported the newer execbuffer2 ioctl and using it by default > when it exists since libdrm commit b50964027

Re: [PATCH] i915: Drop legacy execbuffer support

2021-03-11 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On March 11, 2021 20:26:06 "Dixit, Ashutosh" wrote: On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:00:49 -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote: libdrm has supported the newer execbuffer2 ioctl and using it by default when it exists since libdrm commit b50964027bef249a0cc3d511de05c2464e0a1e22 which landed Mar 2, 2010. The i9

Re: [PATCH] i915: Drop legacy execbuffer support

2021-03-11 Thread Dixit, Ashutosh
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:00:49 -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > libdrm has supported the newer execbuffer2 ioctl and using it by default > when it exists since libdrm commit b50964027bef249a0cc3d511de05c2464e0a1e22 > which landed Mar 2, 2010. The i915 and i965 drivers in Mesa at the time > both used

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] i915: Drop legacy execbuffer support

2021-03-11 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 08:04, Keith Packard wrote: > > Jason Ekstrand writes: > > > libdrm has supported the newer execbuffer2 ioctl and using it by default > > when it exists since libdrm commit b50964027bef249a0cc3d511de05c2464e0a1e22 > > which landed Mar 2, 2010. The i915 and i965 drivers in

Re: [PATCH] i915: Drop legacy execbuffer support

2021-03-10 Thread Keith Packard
Jason Ekstrand writes: > libdrm has supported the newer execbuffer2 ioctl and using it by default > when it exists since libdrm commit b50964027bef249a0cc3d511de05c2464e0a1e22 > which landed Mar 2, 2010. The i915 and i965 drivers in Mesa at the time > both used libdrm and so did the Intel X11 ba

[PATCH] i915: Drop legacy execbuffer support

2021-03-10 Thread Jason Ekstrand
libdrm has supported the newer execbuffer2 ioctl and using it by default when it exists since libdrm commit b50964027bef249a0cc3d511de05c2464e0a1e22 which landed Mar 2, 2010. The i915 and i965 drivers in Mesa at the time both used libdrm and so did the Intel X11 back-end. The SNA back-end for X11