On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 09:03:06PM +0100, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> When patching gathers, we don't need to check against
> gathers with lower indices than the current one, as
> they are guaranteed to already have been handled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund
> ---
>
> Here's a trivial optimizat
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 09:03:06PM +0100, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> When patching gathers, we don't need to check against
> gathers with lower indices than the current one, as
> they are guaranteed to already have been handled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund
> ---
>
> Here's a trivial optimizat
On 07.01.2014 22:03, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> When patching gathers, we don't need to check against
> gathers with lower indices than the current one, as
> they are guaranteed to already have been handled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund
> ---
>
> Here's a trivial optimization I have been runni
Ping?
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> When patching gathers, we don't need to check against
> gathers with lower indices than the current one, as
> they are guaranteed to already have been handled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund
> ---
>
> Here's a trivial optimization
When patching gathers, we don't need to check against
gathers with lower indices than the current one, as
they are guaranteed to already have been handled.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund
---
Here's a trivial optimization I have been running with for a while.
drivers/gpu/host1x/job.c | 2 +-
1 f
