On Thu, 24 May 2018, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 09:41 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 May 2018, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > There is currently a mixture of octal and symbolic permissions uses
>> > in files in drivers/gpu/drm and one file in drivers/gpu.
>> >
>> > There are ~2
On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 09:41 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2018, Joe Perches wrote:
> > There is currently a mixture of octal and symbolic permissions uses
> > in files in drivers/gpu/drm and one file in drivers/gpu.
> >
> > There are ~270 existing octal uses and ~115 S_ uses.
> >
>
Well I think we rejected that multiple times now.
At least I find the symbolic permissions easier to read and I absolutely
don't see any reason why we should only use one form.
Christian.
Am 24.05.2018 um 22:22 schrieb Joe Perches:
There is currently a mixture of octal and symbolic permissio
On Thu, 24 May 2018, Joe Perches wrote:
> There is currently a mixture of octal and symbolic permissions uses
> in files in drivers/gpu/drm and one file in drivers/gpu.
>
> There are ~270 existing octal uses and ~115 S_ uses.
>
> Convert all the S_ symbolic permissions to their octal equivalents
>
There is currently a mixture of octal and symbolic permissions uses
in files in drivers/gpu/drm and one file in drivers/gpu.
There are ~270 existing octal uses and ~115 S_ uses.
Convert all the S_ symbolic permissions to their octal equivalents
as using octal and not symbolic permissions is prefe
