回复: Re: [PATCH] gpu/drm/radeon:Fix null pointer risk

   Then the judgment in line 944 is needed. Are the possibilities of these two positions consistent.Why keep this judgment？Regards,Wen Zhiwei.           主　题：Re: [PATCH] gpu/drm/radeon:Fix null pointer risk            日　期：2021-12-31 00:36            发件人：Christian König            收件人：Wen

Re: 回复: Re: [PATCH] gpu/drm/radeon:Fix null pointer risk

*主　题：*Re: [PATCH] gpu/drm/radeon:Fix null pointer risk *日　期：*2021-12-31 00:36 *发件人：*Christian König *收件人：*Wen zhiweialexander.deuc...@amd.comxinhui.pan@amd.comairlied@linux.iedan...@ffwll.ch Am 28.12.21 um 08:31 schrieb Wen Zhiwei: > If the null pointer is not judged in advance, > there is a

[PATCH] gpu/drm/radeon:Fix null pointer risk

If the null pointer is not judged in advance, there is a risk that the pointer will cross the boundary Signed-off-by: Wen Zhiwei --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon

Re: [PATCH] gpu/drm/radeon:Fix null pointer risk

Am 28.12.21 um 08:31 schrieb Wen Zhiwei: If the null pointer is not judged in advance, there is a risk that the pointer will cross the boundary As far as I can see that case is impossible, why do you want to add a check for it? Regards, Christian. Signed-off-by: Wen Zhiwei --- drivers/