On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:11:51AM +0100, Patrik Jakobsson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Alan wrote:
> > From: Alan Cox
> >
> > This is a left over from the great clean ups in the past. It's confusing as
> > it returns an int, yet has one caller that never uses it. The caller already
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Alan wrote:
> From: Alan Cox
>
> This is a left over from the great clean ups in the past. It's confusing as
> it returns an int, yet has one caller that never uses it. The caller already
> has all the right private variables local so the entire function can be
>
From: Alan Cox
This is a left over from the great clean ups in the past. It's confusing as
it returns an int, yet has one caller that never uses it. The caller already
has all the right private variables local so the entire function can be
replaced by a simple if call.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox
-
