On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:16 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:17:31 -0700
> Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
> > >
On Wed, 4 May 2011 17:49:37 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> How about you look at git and see what happened last time?
>
> We added some dri2 proto requests, and people wanted to build with old
> versions w/o the new requests. So they added some ifdefs but didn't
> check all the combos (now not just
On Wed, 4 May 2011 17:49:37 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> How about you look at git and see what happened last time?
>
> We added some dri2 proto requests, and people wanted to build with old
> versions w/o the new requests. So they added some ifdefs but didn't
> check all the combos (now not just
On Thu, 05 May 2011 09:32:46 +1000
Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:16 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:17:31 -0700
> > Ian Romanick wrote:
> >
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
On Thu, 05 May 2011 09:32:46 +1000
Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:16 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:17:31 -0700
> > Ian Romanick wrote:
> >
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:16 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:17:31 -0700
> Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
> > >
On Wed, 4 May 2011 16:16:37 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:17:31 -0700
> Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
> > >
On Wed, 4 May 2011 16:16:37 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:17:31 -0700
> Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
> > >
On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:17:31 -0700
Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
>
> Is there any way we could do this
On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:17:31 -0700
Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
>
> Is there any way we could do this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
Is there any way we could do this and NOT break building older versions
of Mesa? I'd like to be able to buil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/03/2011 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
Is there any way we could do this and NOT break building older versions
of Mesa? I'd like to be able to buil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/03/2011 02:08 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2011 14:02:31 -0700
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 03 May 2011 13:54:38 -0700
>> Keith Packard wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 3 May 2011 12:21:24 -0700, Jesse Barnes
>>> wrote:
>>>
We on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/03/2011 02:08 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2011 14:02:31 -0700
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 03 May 2011 13:54:38 -0700
>> Keith Packard wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 3 May 2011 12:21:24 -0700, Jesse Barnes >> virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
On Tue, 03 May 2011 14:15:30 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2011 14:08:58 -0700, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
>
> > Fixed version below.
>
> Reviewed-by: Keith Packard
>
> (assuming that the GLX protocol specification gets updated to match :-)
Yeah, Ian is fixing up the padding there
On Tue, 03 May 2011 14:15:30 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2011 14:08:58 -0700, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
>
> > Fixed version below.
>
> Reviewed-by: Keith Packard
>
> (assuming that the GLX protocol specification gets updated to match :-)
Yeah, Ian is fixing up the padding there
On Tue, 3 May 2011 14:08:58 -0700, Jesse Barnes
wrote:
> Fixed version below.
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard
(assuming that the GLX protocol specification gets updated to match :-)
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpc0zttIhtY3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 3 May 2011 14:08:58 -0700, Jesse Barnes
wrote:
> Fixed version below.
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard
(assuming that the GLX protocol specification gets updated to match :-)
--
keith.packard at intel.com
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name:
c). Yay for divergence.
Fixed version below.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>From f5403828c68af0f12c79c0504df0a4781ca84b2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jesse Barnes
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 12:14:10 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] glxproto: make GLX swap event struct match spec
We only s
On Tue, 3 May 2011 14:02:31 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 03 May 2011 13:54:38 -0700
> Keith Packard wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 3 May 2011 12:21:24 -0700, Jesse Barnes > virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> >
> > > We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
> >
> > You're missing t
On Tue, 03 May 2011 13:54:38 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2011 12:21:24 -0700, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
>
> > We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
>
> You're missing the explicit 16-bit padding field after 'event_type'
>
> The documented encoding
> http:/
On Tue, 03 May 2011 13:54:38 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2011 12:21:24 -0700, Jesse Barnes virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
>
> > We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
>
> You're missing the explicit 16-bit padding field after 'event_type'
>
> The documented en
On Tue, 3 May 2011 12:21:24 -0700, Jesse Barnes
wrote:
> We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
You're missing the explicit 16-bit padding field after 'event_type'
The documented encoding
http://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/INTEL/swap_event.txt needs to be
fixed to mat
On Tue, 3 May 2011 12:21:24 -0700, Jesse Barnes
wrote:
> We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
You're missing the explicit 16-bit padding field after 'event_type'
The documented encoding
http://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/INTEL/swap_event.txt needs to be
fixed to mat
We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
---
configure.ac |2 +-
glxproto.h |3 +--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index d88e6df..a3047e4 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configu
We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
---
configure.ac |2 +-
glxproto.h |3 +--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index d88e6df..a3047e4 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configu
We only spec a 32 bit swap count, so drop the high sbc field. Also make
the padding explicit (most compilers would have already done this since
it's not a packed structure, but making it explicit should prevent
surprises in the future).
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
---
configure.ac |2 +-
gl
27 matches
Mail list logo
