Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: backlight: lm3630a: correct schema validation

2019-06-28 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, 20 May 2019 04:58:46 -0400, Brian Masney wrote: > The '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' properties were not defined in > the lm3630a bindings and would cause the following error when > attempting to validate the examples against the schema: > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backl

[PATCH] dt-bindings: backlight: lm3630a: correct schema validation

2019-05-22 Thread Brian Masney
The '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' properties were not defined in the lm3630a bindings and would cause the following error when attempting to validate the examples against the schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/lm3630a-backlight.example.dt.yaml: '#address-cells', '#size-c

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: backlight: lm3630a: correct schema validation

2019-05-21 Thread Dan Murphy
On 5/20/19 8:30 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 08:14:03AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:59 AM Brian Masney wrote: >>> >>> The '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' properties were not defined in >>> the lm3630a bindings and would cause the following e

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: backlight: lm3630a: correct schema validation

2019-05-20 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 08:14:03AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:59 AM Brian Masney wrote: > > > > The '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' properties were not defined in > > the lm3630a bindings and would cause the following error when > > attempting to validate the examples

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: backlight: lm3630a: correct schema validation

2019-05-20 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:59 AM Brian Masney wrote: > > The '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' properties were not defined in > the lm3630a bindings and would cause the following error when > attempting to validate the examples against the schema: > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlig