On 07/17/2015 11:12 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:02:26AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> Hi Benji,
>>
>> On 07/16/2015 03:08 PM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>>> Maxime, as STi DT maintainer, could you give us your point of view ?
>> I agree these DT nodes are not used in p
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:02:26AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi Benji,
>
> On 07/16/2015 03:08 PM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> >Maxime, as STi DT maintainer, could you give us your point of view ?
> I agree these DT nodes are not used in products today, and only used by very
> few people.
> T
Hi Benji,
On 07/16/2015 03:08 PM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> Maxime, as STi DT maintainer, could you give us your point of view ?
I agree these DT nodes are not used in products today, and only used by
very few people.
These people use aligned version of DT and Kernel, so I think we can
break th
hi ben:
your patch is ok, i don't know your hardware how to use. In this first
code why use that style dts? If you detail research our patch, you will
find that it can compatiable your fixing dts.
If you don't approve our patch better, I will be glad to see you to slove
this bug
Thank you
Xinwei
Maxime, as STi DT maintainer, could you give us your point of view ?
If needed I could split the patch in two: one for driver and one for DT.
2015-07-16 12:59 GMT+02:00 Thierry Reding :
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:56:41PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>> It doesn't change any bindings fields,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:56:41PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> It doesn't change any bindings fields, only remove one level of childs on DT.
> Old DTBs may not work but it will impact only very few peoples and no
> products so it isn't a problem.
I know, that can be said of most platforms, b
It doesn't change any bindings fields, only remove one level of childs on DT.
Old DTBs may not work but it will impact only very few peoples and no
products so it isn't a problem.
The patch fix driver and DT files so I don't think it could create issues.
2015-07-15 15:34 GMT+02:00 Thierry Reding
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:21:46PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> Fix misunderstanding in how use component framework.
> drm_platform_init() is now call only when all the
> sub-components are register themselves instead of the
> previous two stages mechanism.
>
> Update devicetree and bindings
Fix misunderstanding in how use component framework.
drm_platform_init() is now call only when all the
sub-components are register themselves instead of the
previous two stages mechanism.
Update devicetree and bindings documentation according
to this new behavior.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard
