On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 02:32:12PM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_next() returns idr_alloc() which can return
> -ENOMEM, -EINVAL or -ENOSPC none of which are -1 . but the call sites
> of drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_next() seem to be assuming that the error case
> would be -1 (orig
drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_next() returns idr_alloc() which can return
-ENOMEM, -EINVAL or -ENOSPC none of which are -1 . but the call sites
of drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_next() seem to be assuming that the error case
would be -1 (original return of drm_ctxbitmap_next() prior to 2.6.23
was actually -1). Thus
