Hi,
On 18/04/18 17:29, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch complains that "area_free" could be used without being
> initialized. This code is several years old and premusably works fine
> so this can't be a very serious bug. But it's easy enough to silence
> the warning. If "area_free" is false at th
Smatch complains that "area_free" could be used without being
initialized. This code is several years old and premusably works fine
so this can't be a very serious bug. But it's easy enough to silence
the warning. If "area_free" is false at the end of the function then
we return -ENOMEM.
Signed