On Thu, Jun 12, 2025, at 16:37, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 12/06/2025 15:40, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> static u16 DISPC_OVL_BASE(enum omap_plane_id plane)
> {
> static const u16 bases[] = {0x0080, 0x00BC, 0x014C, 0x0300, 0x0500};
> return bases[plane];
> }
>
> In any case, I'll apply this wit
Hi,
On 12/06/2025 15:40, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025, at 09:58, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 10/06/2025 12:27, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>> -static void dispc_restore_context(struct dispc_device *dispc)
>>> +static noinline_for_stack void dispc_restore_context(struct dispc_device
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025, at 09:58, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 10/06/2025 12:27, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> -static void dispc_restore_context(struct dispc_device *dispc)
>> +static noinline_for_stack void dispc_restore_context(struct dispc_device
>> *dispc)
>> {
>> int i, j;
>>
>
> While I
Hi,
On 10/06/2025 12:27, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> The thread sanitizer makes the stack usage explode from extra variable
> spills in dispc_runtime_resume:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c:4735:27: error: stack frame size (1824)
> exceeds limit (1280) in 'dispc_runt
From: Arnd Bergmann
The thread sanitizer makes the stack usage explode from extra variable
spills in dispc_runtime_resume:
drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c:4735:27: error: stack frame size (1824)
exceeds limit (1280) in 'dispc_runtime_resume' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
I could not figure
