On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:12:41 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> From: Dave Airlie
>>
>> We hit this a lot with i915 and although we'd like to engineer things to hit
>> it a lot less, this commit at least makes it consume a few less cycles.
>>
>> from someth
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:12:41 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> From: Dave Airlie
>>
>> We hit this a lot with i915 and although we'd like to engineer things to hit
>> it a lot less, this commit at least makes it consume a few less cycles.
>>
>> from someth
From: Dave Airlie
We hit this a lot with i915 and although we'd like to engineer things to hit
it a lot less, this commit at least makes it consume a few less cycles.
from something containing
movzwl 0x0(%rip),%r10d
to
add%r8,%rdx
I only noticed it while using perf to profile something else
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:12:41 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> We hit this a lot with i915 and although we'd like to engineer things to hit
> it a lot less, this commit at least makes it consume a few less cycles.
>
> from something containing
> movzwl 0x0(%rip),%r10d
> to
> add
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:12:41 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> We hit this a lot with i915 and although we'd like to engineer things to hit
> it a lot less, this commit at least makes it consume a few less cycles.
>
> from something containing
> movzwl 0x0(%rip),%r10d
> to
> add
From: Dave Airlie
We hit this a lot with i915 and although we'd like to engineer things to hit
it a lot less, this commit at least makes it consume a few less cycles.
from something containing
movzwl 0x0(%rip),%r10d
to
add%r8,%rdx
I only noticed it while using perf to profile something else
