On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:16:59PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> After spending slightly more time than I'd care to admit debugging the
> various and presumably spectacular way things fail when you pass too low
> a value to drm_vblank_init() (thanks console-lock for not letting me see
> the carnage!),
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 03:06:40PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Ville Syrj?l?
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:16:59PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> After spending slightly more time than I'd care to admit debugging the
> >> various and presumably spectacular way
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:16:59PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> After spending slightly more time than I'd care to admit debugging the
> various and presumably spectacular way things fail when you pass too low
> a value to drm_vblank_init() (thanks console-lock for not letting me see
> the carnage!),
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 03:06:40PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Ville Syrj?l?
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:16:59PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>> >> After spending slightly more time than I'd care to adm
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Ville Syrj?l?
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:16:59PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>> After spending slightly more time than I'd care to admit debugging the
>> various and presumably spectacular way things fail when you pass too low
>> a value to drm_vblank_init() (t
After spending slightly more time than I'd care to admit debugging the
various and presumably spectacular way things fail when you pass too low
a value to drm_vblank_init() (thanks console-lock for not letting me see
the carnage!), I decided it might be a good idea to add some sanity
checking.
Sig