For me, it is good :)
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Harry Wentland
wrote:
> This looks good but we should probably do the same for all return paths
> when reference for port has been acquired.
>
> Please see attached patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Harry
>
>
> On 2016-02-01 11:08 AM, Insu Yun wrote:
>
>>
This looks good but we should probably do the same for all return paths
when reference for port has been acquired.
Please see attached patch.
Thanks,
Harry
On 2016-02-01 11:08 AM, Insu Yun wrote:
> In drm_dp_mst_allocate_vcpi, it returns true in two paths,
> but in one path, there is no referen
In drm_dp_mst_allocate_vcpi, it returns true in two paths,
but in one path, there is no reference couting decrease.
Signed-off-by: Insu Yun
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_d
