Re: [PATCH] drm: fix fallouts from slow-work -> wq conversion

2018-06-19 Thread Dave Airlie
On 9 August 2010 at 20:20, Tejun Heo wrote: > >From 9a919c46dfa48a9c1f465174609b90253eb8ffc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tejun Heo > Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:01:27 +0200 > > Commit 991ea75c (drm: use workqueue instead of slow-work), which made > drm to use wq instead of slow-work, didn't acc

[PATCH] drm: fix fallouts from slow-work -> wq conversion

2018-06-19 Thread Tejun Heo
>From 9a919c46dfa48a9c1f465174609b90253eb8ffc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:01:27 +0200 Commit 991ea75c (drm: use workqueue instead of slow-work), which made drm to use wq instead of slow-work, didn't account for the return value difference between delayed_slo

[PATCH] drm: fix fallouts from slow-work -> wq conversion

2010-08-09 Thread Tejun Heo

Re: [PATCH] drm: fix fallouts from slow-work -> wq conversion

2010-08-09 Thread walt
On 08/09/2010 03:20 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: From 9a919c46dfa48a9c1f465174609b90253eb8ffc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:01:27 +0200 Commit 991ea75c (drm: use workqueue instead of slow-work), which made drm to use wq instead of slow-work, didn't account for the r

[PATCH] drm: fix fallouts from slow-work -> wq conversion

2010-08-09 Thread Tejun Heo
>From 9a919c46dfa48a9c1f465174609b90253eb8ffc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:01:27 +0200 Commit 991ea75c (drm: use workqueue instead of slow-work), which made drm to use wq instead of slow-work, didn't account for the return value difference between delayed_slo

[PATCH] drm: fix fallouts from slow-work -> wq conversion

2010-08-09 Thread walt
On 08/09/2010 03:20 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > From 9a919c46dfa48a9c1f465174609b90253eb8ffc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tejun Heo > Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:01:27 +0200 > > Commit 991ea75c (drm: use workqueue instead of slow-work), which made > drm to use wq instead of slow-work, didn't account