On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Frank Binns wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't know if this patch got missed in the list traffic or if I did
> something wrong but it doesn't appear to have been picked up. This is my
> first time contributing so if I did anything wrong some pointers would be
> appreciated
s+frank.binns=imgtec.com at lists.freedesktop.org
> [mailto:dri-devel-bounces+frank.binns=imgtec.com at lists.freedesktop.org] On
> Behalf Of Frank Binns
> Sent: 14 May 2012 16:28
> To: 'airlied at linux.ie'; 'dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org'
> Subject: [PATCH] drm:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Frank Binns wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't know if this patch got missed in the list traffic or if I did
> something wrong but it doesn't appear to have been picked up. This is my
> first time contributing so if I did anything wrong some pointers would be
> appreciated
.binns=imgtec@lists.freedesktop.org
> [mailto:dri-devel-bounces+frank.binns=imgtec@lists.freedesktop.org] On
> Behalf Of Frank Binns
> Sent: 14 May 2012 16:28
> To: 'airl...@linux.ie'; 'dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org'
> Subject: [PATCH] drm: fix case
The framebuffer helper panic notifier is unregistered, in drm_fb_helper_fini(),
when kernel_fb_helper_list goes from being non-empty to empty. However, in
drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe(), it's possible for the panic notifier to be
registered without an element being added to this list if a drive
The framebuffer helper panic notifier is unregistered, in drm_fb_helper_fini(),
when kernel_fb_helper_list goes from being non-empty to empty. However, in
drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe(), it's possible for the panic notifier to be
registered without an element being added to this list if a drive
