From: Shirish S
The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
for the 4 block (512) data.
To do this, a single 8-bit segment index is
passed to the display via the I2C address 30h.
Data from the selected segment is then immediately
read via the reg
From: Shirish S
The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
for the 4 block (512) data.
To do this, a single 8-bit segment index is
passed to the display via the I2C address 30h.
Data from the selected segment is then immediately
read via the reg
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:06:53AM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:52:26AM +0300, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:28:20PM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012
Small clarification:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:06:53AM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> > Hello Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:52:26AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > >
Small clarification:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:06:53AM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> > Hello Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:52:26AM +0300, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:06:53AM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:52:26AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:28:20PM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:52:26AM +0300, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:28:20PM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Ville Syrj?l? <
> > ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:55:53AM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> > Her
Hello Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:52:26AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:28:20PM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Ville Syrjälä <
> > > ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
Hello Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:52:26AM +0300, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:28:20PM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Ville Syrj?l? <
> > > ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote
Hello Ville,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Ville Syrjälä <
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:28:20PM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Ville Syrjälä <
> > ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:55:
Hello Ville,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Ville Syrj?l? <
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:28:20PM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Ville Syrj?l? <
> > ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:52:26AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:28:20PM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Ville Syrjälä <
> > ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:55:53AM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> > Here a
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:28:20PM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Ville Syrj?l? <
> ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:55:53AM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> Here are my earlier comments on Jean's patch:
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 04:28:20PM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Ville Syrjälä <
> ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:55:53AM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> Here are my earlier comments on Jean's patch:
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/ar
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:55:53AM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> Hello Ville Syrj?l?,
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Ville Syrj?l? <
> ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:40:48PM +0530, Shirish S wrote:
> > > The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Ville Syrjälä <
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:55:53AM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> > Hello Ville Syrjälä,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Ville Syrjälä <
> > ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 21,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Ville Syrj?l? <
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:55:53AM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> > Hello Ville Syrj?l?,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Ville Syrj?l? <
> > ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Au
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:40:48PM +0530, Shirish S wrote:
> The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
> 2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
> for the 4 block (512) data.
A patch for this was already sent a long time ago:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2011-Decembe
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Shirish S wrote:
> The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
> 2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
> for the 4 block (512) data.
>
> To do this, a single 8-bit segment index is
> passed to the display via the I2C address 30h.
> Data from the selecte
The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
for the 4 block (512) data.
To do this, a single 8-bit segment index is
passed to the display via the I2C address 30h.
Data from the selected segment is then immediately
read via the regular DDC2 address
This patch adds support in probing 4 block edid data, for E-DDC.
This is the first test case in CTS, for HDMI compliance.
Based on drm-next branch
Shirish S (1):
drm: edid: add support for E-DDC
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 17 -
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletion
Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2012, 12:40 +0530 schrieb Shirish S:
> The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
> 2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
> for the 4 block (512) data.
>
> To do this, a single 8-bit segment index is
> passed to the display via the I2C address 30h.
> Data from t
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:55:53AM -0700, Shirish S wrote:
> Hello Ville Syrjälä,
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Ville Syrjälä <
> ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:40:48PM +0530, Shirish S wrote:
> > > The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
> >
Hello Ville Syrjälä,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Ville Syrjälä <
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:40:48PM +0530, Shirish S wrote:
> > The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
> > 2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
> > for the 4 block (512)
Hello Ville Syrj?l?,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Ville Syrj?l? <
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:40:48PM +0530, Shirish S wrote:
> > The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
> > 2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
> > for the 4 block (51
Hello Daniel,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Shirish S wrote:
> > The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
> > 2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
> > for the 4 block (512) data.
> >
> > To do this, a single 8-bit segmen
Hello Daniel,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Shirish S wrote:
> > The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
> > 2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
> > for the 4 block (512) data.
> >
> > To do this, a single 8-bit segmen
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:40:48PM +0530, Shirish S wrote:
> The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
> 2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
> for the 4 block (512) data.
A patch for this was already sent a long time ago:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2011-Decembe
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Shirish S wrote:
> The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
> 2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
> for the 4 block (512) data.
>
> To do this, a single 8-bit segment index is
> passed to the display via the I2C address 30h.
> Data from the selecte
Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2012, 12:40 +0530 schrieb Shirish S:
> The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
> 2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
> for the 4 block (512) data.
>
> To do this, a single 8-bit segment index is
> passed to the display via the I2C address 30h.
> Data from t
This patch adds support in probing 4 block edid data, for E-DDC.
This is the first test case in CTS, for HDMI compliance.
Based on drm-next branch
Shirish S (1):
drm: edid: add support for E-DDC
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 17 -
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletion
The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
for the 4 block (512) data.
To do this, a single 8-bit segment index is
passed to the display via the I2C address 30h.
Data from the selected segment is then immediately
read via the regular DDC2 address
32 matches
Mail list logo