On 05.02.2018 19:07, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 06:39:05PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
>> Am Montag, den 05.02.2018, 18:33 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding:
>>> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:11:30PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:04:31PM +0200, Thierry Redi
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 06:39:05PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Montag, den 05.02.2018, 18:33 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:11:30PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:04:31PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:
Am Montag, den 05.02.2018, 18:33 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:11:30PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:04:31PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:52:32AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > > Hi Rob,
> > > >
> > > > Am
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:11:30PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:04:31PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:52:32AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 29.03.2017, 08:56 -0500 schrieb Rob Herring:
> > > > On Mon,
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:29:09PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Montag, den 05.02.2018, 17:11 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:04:31PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:52:32AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > > Hi Rob,
> > > >
> > > > Am Mi
Am Montag, den 05.02.2018, 17:11 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:04:31PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:52:32AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 29.03.2017, 08:56 -0500 schrieb Rob Herring:
> > > > On Mon,
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:04:31PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:52:32AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, den 29.03.2017, 08:56 -0500 schrieb Rob Herring:
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Thierry Reding
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan
On 20.11.2017 08:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:34:19PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 05.04.2017 14:04, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:52:32AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
Hi Rob,
Am Mittwoch, den 29.03.2017, 08:56 -0500 schrieb Rob Herri
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:34:19PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 05.04.2017 14:04, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:52:32AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> >> Hi Rob,
> >>
> >> Am Mittwoch, den 29.03.2017, 08:56 -0500 schrieb Rob Herring:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:33 AM, T
On 05.04.2017 14:04, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:52:32AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Am Mittwoch, den 29.03.2017, 08:56 -0500 schrieb Rob Herring:
>>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Thierry Reding
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:36:30PM +0100, Lu
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:52:32AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 29.03.2017, 08:56 -0500 schrieb Rob Herring:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Thierry Reding
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:36:30PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > >> The i2c adapter on DP
Hi Rob,
Am Mittwoch, den 29.03.2017, 08:56 -0500 schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:36:30PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> >> The i2c adapter on DP AUX is purely a software construct. Linking
> >> it to the device node of t
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:36:30PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
>> The i2c adapter on DP AUX is purely a software construct. Linking
>> it to the device node of the parent device is wrong, as it leads to
>> 2 devices sharing the same device no
Am Montag, den 23.01.2017, 17:33 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:36:30PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > The i2c adapter on DP AUX is purely a software construct. Linking
> > it to the device node of the parent device is wrong, as it leads to
> > 2 devices sharing the same
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:36:30PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> The i2c adapter on DP AUX is purely a software construct. Linking
> it to the device node of the parent device is wrong, as it leads to
> 2 devices sharing the same device node, which is bad practice, as
Who says that two devices can't
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:36:30PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> The i2c adapter on DP AUX is purely a software construct. Linking
> it to the device node of the parent device is wrong, as it leads to
> 2 devices sharing the same device node, which is bad practice, as
> well as the i2c trying to popu
The i2c adapter on DP AUX is purely a software construct. Linking
it to the device node of the parent device is wrong, as it leads to
2 devices sharing the same device node, which is bad practice, as
well as the i2c trying to populate children of the i2c adapter by
looking at the child device nodes
17 matches
Mail list logo