On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 04:55, Hangyu Hua wrote:
>
> On 2022/5/18 15:57, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 18.05.2022 08:58, Hangyu Hua wrote:
> >> The next call to sii8620_burst_get_tx_buf will result in off-by-one
> >> When ctx->burst.tx_count + size == ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->burst.tx_buf). The
> >> s
On 2022/5/18 15:57, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 18.05.2022 08:58, Hangyu Hua wrote:
The next call to sii8620_burst_get_tx_buf will result in off-by-one
When ctx->burst.tx_count + size == ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->burst.tx_buf). The
same
thing happens in sii8620_burst_get_rx_buf.
This patch also change tx
On 18.05.2022 08:58, Hangyu Hua wrote:
The next call to sii8620_burst_get_tx_buf will result in off-by-one
When ctx->burst.tx_count + size == ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->burst.tx_buf). The same
thing happens in sii8620_burst_get_rx_buf.
This patch also change tx_count and tx_buf to rx_count and rx_buf in
The next call to sii8620_burst_get_tx_buf will result in off-by-one
When ctx->burst.tx_count + size == ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->burst.tx_buf). The same
thing happens in sii8620_burst_get_rx_buf.
This patch also change tx_count and tx_buf to rx_count and rx_buf in
sii8620_burst_get_rx_buf. It is unreasonabl
