Dne petek, 10. marec 2023 ob 15:47:05 CET je Rob Herring napisal(a):
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_ functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of
On Fri, 2023-03-10 at 08:47 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_ functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property
On 10/03/2023 16:47, Rob Herring wrote:
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_ functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
recentl
Hi Rob,
Thank you for the patch.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 08:47:05AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_ functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this,
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_ functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
recently added of_property_present() helper when
