On 27 Jun 07:14 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:29:09PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > No. We don't need to change the link order.
> >
> > Could you clarify why? I guess you have some case in mind where changing
> > the link order breaks things or makes something
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:29:09PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> Thanks for looking at this.
>
> On 23 Jun 04:58 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 10:14:36PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > Given panels and I2C-connected encoders are required by DRM drive
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 10:14:36PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Given panels and I2C-connected encoders are required by DRM drivers,
> we need to change the link order so these are probed first. This commit
> moves all the i2c, panel and bridge helper drivers so they are probed
> before the DRM
Hi Thierry,
Thanks for looking at this.
On 23 Jun 04:58 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 10:14:36PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > Given panels and I2C-connected encoders are required by DRM drivers,
> > we need to change the link order so these are probed first. This commit
Given panels and I2C-connected encoders are required by DRM drivers,
we need to change the link order so these are probed first. This commit
moves all the i2c, panel and bridge helper drivers so they are probed
before the DRM drivers.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia
---
drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile |