On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 3:06 PM Ian Forbes wrote:
>
> Because sync_files are passive waiters they do not participate in
> the processing of fences like the traditional vmw_fence_wait IOCTL.
> If userspace exclusively uses sync_files for synchronization then
> nothing in the kernel actually process
Because sync_files are passive waiters they do not participate in
the processing of fences like the traditional vmw_fence_wait IOCTL.
If userspace exclusively uses sync_files for synchronization then
nothing in the kernel actually processes fence updates as interrupts
for fences are masked and igno