Re: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Add seqno waiter for sync_files

2025-03-03 Thread Zack Rusin
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 3:06 PM Ian Forbes wrote: > > Because sync_files are passive waiters they do not participate in > the processing of fences like the traditional vmw_fence_wait IOCTL. > If userspace exclusively uses sync_files for synchronization then > nothing in the kernel actually process

[PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Add seqno waiter for sync_files

2025-03-01 Thread Ian Forbes
Because sync_files are passive waiters they do not participate in the processing of fences like the traditional vmw_fence_wait IOCTL. If userspace exclusively uses sync_files for synchronization then nothing in the kernel actually processes fence updates as interrupts for fences are masked and igno