[PATCH] drm/ttm: switch back to static allocation limits for now

The shrinker based approach still has some flaws. Especially that we need temporary pages to free up the pages allocated to the driver is problematic in a shrinker. Signed-off-by: Christian König Acked-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c | 14 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_tt

[PATCH] drm/ttm: switch back to static allocation limits for now

The shrinker based approach still has some flaws. Especially that we need temporary pages to free up the pages allocated to the driver is problematic in a shrinker. Signed-off-by: Christian König Acked-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c | 14 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_tt

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: switch back to static allocation limits for now

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:27 AM Christian König wrote: > > Am 25.03.21 um 09:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 9:07 AM Christian König > > wrote: > >> Am 24.03.21 um 20:29 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > >>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > The

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: switch back to static allocation limits for now

Am 25.03.21 um 09:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter: On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 9:07 AM Christian König wrote: Am 24.03.21 um 20:29 schrieb Daniel Vetter: On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Christian König wrote: The shrinker based approach still has some flaws. Especially that we need temporary p

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: switch back to static allocation limits for now

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 9:07 AM Christian König wrote: > > Am 24.03.21 um 20:29 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > >> The shrinker based approach still has some flaws. Especially that we need > >> temporary pages to free up the pages alloc

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: switch back to static allocation limits for now

Am 24.03.21 um 20:29 schrieb Daniel Vetter: On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Christian König wrote: The shrinker based approach still has some flaws. Especially that we need temporary pages to free up the pages allocated to the driver is problematic in a shrinker. Signed-off-by: Christ

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: switch back to static allocation limits for now

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > The shrinker based approach still has some flaws. Especially that we need > temporary pages to free up the pages allocated to the driver is problematic > in a shrinker. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/t

[PATCH] drm/ttm: switch back to static allocation limits for now

The shrinker based approach still has some flaws. Especially that we need temporary pages to free up the pages allocated to the driver is problematic in a shrinker. Signed-off-by: Christian König --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c | 14 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.c | 112