On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 03:09:41PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 18.08.21 um 14:32 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 01:27:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > > Just a gentle ping?
> > >
> > > Does anybody have any objections? It's just switching back to using a
> > > spin
Am 18.08.21 um 14:32 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 01:27:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Just a gentle ping?
Does anybody have any objections? It's just switching back to using a
spinlock in the hot path instead of a mutex.
Thanks,
Christian.
Am 22.07.21 um 13:34 schrieb C
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 01:27:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Just a gentle ping?
>
> Does anybody have any objections? It's just switching back to using a
> spinlock in the hot path instead of a mutex.
>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
>
> Am 22.07.21 um 13:34 schrieb Christian König:
> > Switch ba
Just a gentle ping?
Does anybody have any objections? It's just switching back to using a
spinlock in the hot path instead of a mutex.
Thanks,
Christian.
Am 22.07.21 um 13:34 schrieb Christian König:
Switch back to using a spinlock again by moving the IOMMU unmap outside
of the locked region
Switch back to using a spinlock again by moving the IOMMU unmap outside
of the locked region.
v2: Add a comment explaining why we need sync_shrinkers().
v3: Drop sync_shrinkers() and use an SRCU instead.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c | 45
