Am 07.06.21 um 18:13 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel):
On 6/7/21 3:58 PM, Christian König wrote:
We discussed if that is really the right approach for quite a while
now, but
digging deeper into a bug report on arm turned out that this is actually
horrible broken right now.
The reason for t
On 6/7/21 3:58 PM, Christian König wrote:
We discussed if that is really the right approach for quite a while now, but
digging deeper into a bug report on arm turned out that this is actually
horrible broken right now.
The reason for this is that vmf_insert_mixed_prot() always tries to grab
a
We discussed if that is really the right approach for quite a while now, but
digging deeper into a bug report on arm turned out that this is actually
horrible broken right now.
The reason for this is that vmf_insert_mixed_prot() always tries to grab
a reference to the underlaying page on architect
On 6/2/21 8:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 02:21:17PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
On 6/2/21 2:04 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 02.06.21 um 13:24 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel):
[SNIP]
@@ -576,14 +565,10 @@ static void
ttm_bo_mmap_vma_setup(struct ttm_buffer_object
Am 02.06.21 um 20:38 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:30:13AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
We discussed if that is really the right approach for quite a while now, but
digging deeper into a bug report on arm turned out that this is actually
horrible broken right now.
The re
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:30:13AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> We discussed if that is really the right approach for quite a while now, but
> digging deeper into a bug report on arm turned out that this is actually
> horrible broken right now.
>
> The reason for this is that vmf_insert_mixed_p
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 02:21:17PM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>
> On 6/2/21 2:04 PM, Christian König wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 02.06.21 um 13:24 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel):
> > > [SNIP]
> > > > > > @@ -576,14 +565,10 @@ static void
> > > > > > ttm_bo_mmap_vma_setup(struct ttm_buffer_object
On 6/2/21 2:04 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 02.06.21 um 13:24 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel):
[SNIP]
@@ -576,14 +565,10 @@ static void ttm_bo_mmap_vma_setup(struct
ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct vm_area_s
vma->vm_private_data = bo;
- /*
- * We'd like to use VM_PFNMAP on
Am 02.06.21 um 13:24 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel):
[SNIP]
@@ -576,14 +565,10 @@ static void ttm_bo_mmap_vma_setup(struct
ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct vm_area_s
vma->vm_private_data = bo;
- /*
- * We'd like to use VM_PFNMAP on shared mappings, where
- * (vma->vm_flag
Hi,
On 6/2/21 12:03 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 02.06.21 um 11:07 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel):
On 6/2/21 10:30 AM, Christian König wrote:
We discussed if that is really the right approach for quite a while
now, but
digging deeper into a bug report on arm turned out that this is
actu
Am 02.06.21 um 11:07 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel):
On 6/2/21 10:30 AM, Christian König wrote:
We discussed if that is really the right approach for quite a while
now, but
digging deeper into a bug report on arm turned out that this is actually
horrible broken right now.
The reason for
On 6/2/21 10:30 AM, Christian König wrote:
We discussed if that is really the right approach for quite a while now, but
digging deeper into a bug report on arm turned out that this is actually
horrible broken right now.
The reason for this is that vmf_insert_mixed_prot() always tries to grab
a
We discussed if that is really the right approach for quite a while now, but
digging deeper into a bug report on arm turned out that this is actually
horrible broken right now.
The reason for this is that vmf_insert_mixed_prot() always tries to grab
a reference to the underlaying page on architect
13 matches
Mail list logo
