Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

On 3/16/21 7:28 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 7:18 PM Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: On 3/16/21 3:07 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:24 PM Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: On 3/16/21 12:06 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:38:53AM +

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 7:18 PM Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: > > > On 3/16/21 3:07 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:24 PM Thomas Hellström (Intel) > > wrote: > >> > >> On 3/16/21 12:06 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:38:53AM +0100, Thomas Hellst

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

On 3/16/21 3:07 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:24 PM Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: On 3/16/21 12:06 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:38:53AM +0100, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: Hi, On 3/16/21 10:27 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2021

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:24 PM Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: > > > On 3/16/21 12:06 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:38:53AM +0100, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 3/16/21 10:27 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 08:00:30PM +0100

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

On 3/16/21 12:06 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:38:53AM +0100, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: Hi, On 3/16/21 10:27 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 08:00:30PM +0100, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: On 3/15/21 7:47 PM, Christian König wrote: Am 15.03.21

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:38:53AM +0100, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/16/21 10:27 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 08:00:30PM +0100, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: > > > On 3/15/21 7:47 PM, Christian König wrote: > > > > > > > > Am 15.03.21 um 18:08 schrieb

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

Hi, On 3/16/21 10:27 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 08:00:30PM +0100, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: On 3/15/21 7:47 PM, Christian König wrote: Am 15.03.21 um 18:08 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel): On 3/15/21 11:26 AM, Christian König wrote: Am 13.03.21 um 19:29 schrieb

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 08:00:30PM +0100, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote: > > On 3/15/21 7:47 PM, Christian König wrote: > > > > > > Am 15.03.21 um 18:08 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel): > > > > > > On 3/15/21 11:26 AM, Christian König wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 13.03.21 um 19:29 schr

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

On 3/15/21 7:47 PM, Christian König wrote: Am 15.03.21 um 18:08 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel): On 3/15/21 11:26 AM, Christian König wrote: Am 13.03.21 um 19:29 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel): Hi, Christian On 3/12/21 10:38 AM, Christian König wrote: We seem to have some more drive

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

Am 15.03.21 um 18:08 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel): On 3/15/21 11:26 AM, Christian König wrote: Am 13.03.21 um 19:29 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel): Hi, Christian On 3/12/21 10:38 AM, Christian König wrote: We seem to have some more driver bugs than thought. Signed-off-by: Christia

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

On 3/15/21 8:48 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: Hi Am 13.03.21 um 19:29 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel): Hi, Christian On 3/12/21 10:38 AM, Christian König wrote: We seem to have some more driver bugs than thought. Signed-off-by: Christian König ---   include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 6 --

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

On 3/15/21 11:26 AM, Christian König wrote: Am 13.03.21 um 19:29 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel): Hi, Christian On 3/12/21 10:38 AM, Christian König wrote: We seem to have some more driver bugs than thought. Signed-off-by: Christian König ---   include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 6 --   1

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

Am 13.03.21 um 19:29 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel): Hi, Christian On 3/12/21 10:38 AM, Christian König wrote: We seem to have some more driver bugs than thought. Signed-off-by: Christian König ---   include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 6 --   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

Hi Am 13.03.21 um 19:29 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel): Hi, Christian On 3/12/21 10:38 AM, Christian König wrote: We seem to have some more driver bugs than thought. Signed-off-by: Christian König ---   include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 6 --   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

Hi, Christian On 3/12/21 10:38 AM, Christian König wrote: We seem to have some more driver bugs than thought. Signed-off-by: Christian König --- include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h b/include/drm/

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 09:38, Christian König wrote: > > We seem to have some more driver bugs than thought. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König Acked-by: Matthew Auld ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.

[PATCH] drm/ttm: make ttm_bo_unpin more defensive

We seem to have some more driver bugs than thought. Signed-off-by: Christian König --- include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h index 4fb523dfab32..df9fe596e7c5 100644 --- a/