On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 09:41:35AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.06.21 um 21:19 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:00:38PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 16.06.21 um 11:36 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:47:14AM +0200, Christ
Am 16.06.21 um 21:19 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:00:38PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 16.06.21 um 11:36 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:47:14AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 16.06.21 um 10:37 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:00:38PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.06.21 um 11:36 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:47:14AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 16.06.21 um 10:37 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:46:33AM +0200, Christ
Am 16.06.21 um 11:36 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:47:14AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 16.06.21 um 10:37 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:46:33AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Sending the first message didn't worked, so let's try again.
Am 16.06.2
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:47:14AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.06.21 um 10:37 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:46:33AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > > Sending the first message didn't worked, so let's try again.
> > >
> > > Am 16.06.21 um 08:30 schrieb Dan
Am 16.06.21 um 10:37 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:46:33AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Sending the first message didn't worked, so let's try again.
Am 16.06.21 um 08:30 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
There are three bugs here:
1) We need to call unpopulate() if ttm_tt_populate
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:46:33AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Sending the first message didn't worked, so let's try again.
>
> Am 16.06.21 um 08:30 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > There are three bugs here:
> > 1) We need to call unpopulate() if ttm_tt_populate() succeeds.
> > 2) The "new_man = tt
Sending the first message didn't worked, so let's try again.
Am 16.06.21 um 08:30 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
There are three bugs here:
1) We need to call unpopulate() if ttm_tt_populate() succeeds.
2) The "new_man = ttm_manager_type(bdev, bo->mem.mem_type);" assignment
was wrong and it was real
There are three bugs here:
1) We need to call unpopulate() if ttm_tt_populate() succeeds.
2) The "new_man = ttm_manager_type(bdev, bo->mem.mem_type);" assignment
was wrong and it was really assigning "new_mem = old_mem;". There
is no need for this assignment anyway as we already have the val
