Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: cleanup the resource of ghost objects after locking them

2022-09-08 Thread Christian König
Am 08.09.22 um 09:46 schrieb Matthew Auld: On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 11:26, Matthew Auld wrote: On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 11:00, Christian König wrote: Otherwise lockdep will complain about cleaning up the bulk_move. Not even compile tested. Signed-off-by: Christian König Looks reasonable to me

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: cleanup the resource of ghost objects after locking them

2022-09-08 Thread Matthew Auld
On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 11:26, Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 11:00, Christian König > wrote: > > > > Otherwise lockdep will complain about cleaning up the bulk_move. > > > > Not even compile tested. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian König > > Looks reasonable to me, > Reviewed-by:

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: cleanup the resource of ghost objects after locking them

2022-09-07 Thread Matthew Auld
On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 11:00, Christian König wrote: > > Otherwise lockdep will complain about cleaning up the bulk_move. > > Not even compile tested. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König Looks reasonable to me, Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | 10 +-

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: cleanup the resource of ghost objects after locking them

2022-09-07 Thread Matthew Auld
On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 11:00, Christian König wrote: > > Otherwise lockdep will complain about cleaning up the bulk_move. > > Not even compile tested. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König Can we quickly resend with --cc=intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org to trigger a CI run? It will even compile test

[PATCH] drm/ttm: cleanup the resource of ghost objects after locking them

2022-09-07 Thread Christian König
Otherwise lockdep will complain about cleaning up the bulk_move. Not even compile tested. Signed-off-by: Christian König --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | 10 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/