On 11/30/2012 10:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:35:49PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>> On 11/30/2012 08:25 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 07:31:04PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/30/2012 07:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Nov
On 11/30/2012 08:25 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 07:31:04PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>> On 11/30/2012 07:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:43:36PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/30/2012 06:18 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Nov
On 11/30/2012 07:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:43:36PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>> On 11/30/2012 06:18 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
>>> wrote:
On 11/30/2012 05:30 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30
On 11/30/2012 06:18 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> On 11/30/2012 05:30 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
>>> wrote:
On 11/29/2012 10:58 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
>
> What I tried to
On 11/30/2012 05:30 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> On 11/29/2012 10:58 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
>>>
>>> What I tried to point out was that the synchronization shouldn't be
>>> needed, because the CPU shouldn't do anything with the contents o
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:36:01PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 10:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:35:49PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> >>On 11/30/2012 08:25 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 07:31:04PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrot
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:35:49PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 08:25 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 07:31:04PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> >>On 11/30/2012 07:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:43:36PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrot
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 07:31:04PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 07:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:43:36PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> >>On 11/30/2012 06:18 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Hellstrom >>>shipmail
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:36:01PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 10:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:35:49PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> >>On 11/30/2012 08:25 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 07:31:04PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrot
On 11/30/2012 10:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:35:49PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/30/2012 08:25 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 07:31:04PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/30/2012 07:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:35:49PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 08:25 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 07:31:04PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> >>On 11/30/2012 07:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:43:36PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrot
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:43:36PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 06:18 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> >wrote:
> >>On 11/30/2012 05:30 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
> >>>wrote:
> >
On 11/30/2012 08:25 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 07:31:04PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/30/2012 07:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:43:36PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/30/2012 06:18 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 05:30 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/29/2012 10:58 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
What I tried to point out was that the synchronization shou
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 07:31:04PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 07:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:43:36PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> >>On 11/30/2012 06:18 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> >>>wrote
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> On 11/29/2012 10:58 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
>>
>>
>> What I tried to point out was that the synchronization shouldn't be
>> needed, because the CPU shouldn't do anything with the contents of
>> evicted buffers. The GPU moves the buffers, n
On 11/30/2012 07:07 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:43:36PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/30/2012 06:18 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/30/2012 05:30 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM,
On 11/29/2012 10:58 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
>
> What I tried to point out was that the synchronization shouldn't be
> needed, because the CPU shouldn't do anything with the contents of
> evicted buffers. The GPU moves the buffers, not the CPU. What does the
> CPU do besides updating some kernel stru
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:43:36PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 06:18 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> >wrote:
> >>On 11/30/2012 05:30 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
> >>>wrote:
> >
On 11/30/2012 06:18 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/30/2012 05:30 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
On 11/29/2012 10:58 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
What I tried to point out was that the syn
On 11/29/2012 10:58 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> On 11/29/2012 01:52 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
>>> wrote:
On 11/29/2012 03:15 AM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 05:30 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/29/2012 10:58 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
What I tried to point out was that the synchronization shoul
On 11/30/2012 05:30 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/29/2012 10:58 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
What I tried to point out was that the synchronization shouldn't be
needed, because the CPU shouldn't do anything with the contents of
evicted buffe
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/29/2012 10:58 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>
>>
>> What I tried to point out was that the synchronization shouldn't be
>> needed, because the CPU shouldn't do anything with the contents of
>> evicted buffers. The GPU moves the buffers, no
On 11/29/2012 10:58 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
What I tried to point out was that the synchronization shouldn't be
needed, because the CPU shouldn't do anything with the contents of
evicted buffers. The GPU moves the buffers, not the CPU. What does the
CPU do besides updating some kernel structures?
On 11/29/2012 10:58 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/29/2012 01:52 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
On 11/29/2012 03:15 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Alan Swanson
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> On 11/29/2012 01:52 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/29/2012 03:15 AM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Alan Swanson
wrote:
>
>
On 11/29/2012 01:52 PM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> On 11/29/2012 03:15 AM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Alan Swanson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 18:24 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/29/2012 01:52 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/29/2012 03:15 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Alan Swanson
wrote:
>
>>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> On 11/29/2012 03:15 AM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Alan Swanson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 18:24 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrot
On 11/29/2012 01:52 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/29/2012 03:15 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Alan Swanson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 18:24 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thoma
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:41:34AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/29/2012 12:24 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> >wrote:
> >>On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote:
> >>>From: Jerome Glisse
> >>>
> >>>This patch add a minimum re
On 11/29/2012 12:24 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
>> On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote:
>>> From: Jerome Glisse
>>>
>>> This patch add a minimum residency time configurable for each memory
>>> pool (VRAM, GTT, ...). Intent
On 11/29/2012 03:15 AM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Alan Swanson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 18:24 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
>>> wrote:
On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jer
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:41:34AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/29/2012 12:24 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> >wrote:
> >>On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>From: Jerome Glisse
> >>>
> >>>This patch add a minimum resid
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/29/2012 03:15 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Alan Swanson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 18:24 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Alan Swanson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 18:24 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
>> wrote:
>> > On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From: Jerome Glisse
>> >>
>> >> This patch add a m
On 11/29/2012 12:24 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jerome Glisse
This patch add a minimum residency time configurable for each memory
pool (VRAM, GTT, ...). Intention is to avoid having
On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jerome Glisse
>
> This patch add a minimum residency time configurable for each memory
> pool (VRAM, GTT, ...). Intention is to avoid having a lot of memory
> eviction from VRAM up to a point where the GPU pretty much spend all
> it's ti
On 11/29/2012 03:15 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Alan Swanson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 18:24 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jerome Glisse
This patc
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 18:24 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
> wrote:
> > On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Jerome Glisse
> >>
> >> This patch add a minimum residency time configurable for each memory
> >> pool (VR
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Alan Swanson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 18:24 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
>> wrote:
>> > On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From: Jerome Glisse
>> >>
>> >> This patch add a mi
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> From: Jerome Glisse
>>
>> This patch add a minimum residency time configurable for each memory
>> pool (VRAM, GTT, ...). Intention is to avoid having a lot of memory
>> eviction
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Alan Swanson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 18:24 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
>> wrote:
>> > On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From: Jerome Glisse
>> >>
>> >> This patch add a mini
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 18:24 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> > On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Jerome Glisse
> >>
> >> This patch add a minimum residency time configurable for each memory
> >> pool (VRAM, GT
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Alan Swanson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 18:24 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
>> wrote:
>> > On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From: Jerome Glisse
>> >>
>> >> This patch add a minim
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> From: Jerome Glisse
>>
>> This patch add a minimum residency time configurable for each memory
>> pool (VRAM, GTT, ...). Intention is to avoid having a lot of memory
>> eviction from
On 11/28/2012 04:58 PM, j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jerome Glisse
This patch add a minimum residency time configurable for each memory
pool (VRAM, GTT, ...). Intention is to avoid having a lot of memory
eviction from VRAM up to a point where the GPU pretty much spend all
it's time moving th
From: Jerome Glisse
This patch add a minimum residency time configurable for each memory
pool (VRAM, GTT, ...). Intention is to avoid having a lot of memory
eviction from VRAM up to a point where the GPU pretty much spend all
it's time moving things in and out.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse
---
From: Jerome Glisse
This patch add a minimum residency time configurable for each memory
pool (VRAM, GTT, ...). Intention is to avoid having a lot of memory
eviction from VRAM up to a point where the GPU pretty much spend all
it's time moving things in and out.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse
---
50 matches
Mail list logo