[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/ttm: Remove TTM_HAS_AGP

2016-03-30 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Daniel, [auto build test WARNING on drm/drm-next] [also build test WARNING on v4.6-rc1 next-20160330] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Vetter/drm-ttm-Remove-TTM_HAS_AGP

[PATCH] drm/ttm: Remove TTM_HAS_AGP

2016-03-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 01:53:38PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 30 March 2016 at 12:24, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > It tries to do fancy things with excluding agp support if ttm is > > built-in, but agp isn't. Instead just express this depency like drm > > does and use CONFIG_AGP everywhere. > > >

[PATCH] drm/ttm: Remove TTM_HAS_AGP

2016-03-30 Thread Emil Velikov
On 30 March 2016 at 12:24, Daniel Vetter wrote: > It tries to do fancy things with excluding agp support if ttm is > built-in, but agp isn't. Instead just express this depency like drm > does and use CONFIG_AGP everywhere. > > Also use the neat Makefile magic to make the entire ttm_agp_backend > f

[PATCH] drm/ttm: Remove TTM_HAS_AGP

2016-03-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
It tries to do fancy things with excluding agp support if ttm is built-in, but agp isn't. Instead just express this depency like drm does and use CONFIG_AGP everywhere. Also use the neat Makefile magic to make the entire ttm_agp_backend file optional. v2: Use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AGP) as suggested b

[PATCH] drm/ttm: Remove TTM_HAS_AGP

2016-03-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
It tries to do fancy things with excluding agp support if ttm is built-in, but agp isn't. Instead just express this depency like drm does and use CONFIG_AGP everywhere. Also use the neat Makefile magic to make the entire ttm_agp_backend file optional. v2: Use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AGP) as suggested b