On 2024-04-26 09:01:37 [+0200], To dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org wrote:
> On 2024-04-04 12:25:36 [+0200], To dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org wrote:
> > PREEMPT_RT has a different locking implementation for ww_mutex. The
> > base mutex of struct ww_mutex is declared as struct WW_MUTEX_BASE. The
>
On 2024-04-04 12:25:36 [+0200], To dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org wrote:
> PREEMPT_RT has a different locking implementation for ww_mutex. The
> base mutex of struct ww_mutex is declared as struct WW_MUTEX_BASE. The
> latter is defined as `mutex' for non-PREEMPT_RT builds and `rt_mutex'
> for PREE
PREEMPT_RT has a different locking implementation for ww_mutex. The
base mutex of struct ww_mutex is declared as struct WW_MUTEX_BASE. The
latter is defined as `mutex' for non-PREEMPT_RT builds and `rt_mutex'
for PREEMPT_RT builds.
Using mutex_lock() directly on the base mutex in
ttm_bo_reserve_de