[PATCH] drm/tilcdc increase allowable supported resolution

2014-04-24 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > From: Darren Etheridge > > 1680x1050 appears to also be within the bandwidth capabilities > of the device and memory infrastructure. For this one, is 1680x1050 possible on all devices w/ tilcdc (like 1st gen beaglebone (white), etc)? If not,

[PATCH] drm/tilcdc increase allowable supported resolution

2014-04-24 Thread Darren Etheridge
Rob Clark wrote on Thu [2014-Apr-24 16:51:04 -0400]: > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > From: Darren Etheridge > > > > 1680x1050 appears to also be within the bandwidth capabilities > > of the device and memory infrastructure. > > For this one, is 1680x1050 possible on al

[PATCH] drm/tilcdc increase allowable supported resolution

2014-04-24 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 01:08:58PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > From: Darren Etheridge > > 1680x1050 appears to also be within the bandwidth capabilities > of the device and memory infrastructure. > > Signed-off-by: Darren Etheridge ping > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.h | 2 +- >

[PATCH] drm/tilcdc increase allowable supported resolution

2014-03-03 Thread Felipe Balbi
From: Darren Etheridge 1680x1050 appears to also be within the bandwidth capabilities of the device and memory infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Darren Etheridge --- drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilc