On 2021-03-18 23:47, Dario Binacchi wrote:
Il 17/03/2021 09:19 Tomi Valkeinen ha scritto:
On 14/03/2021 17:13, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> As reported by TI spruh73x RM, the LCD pixel clock (LCD_PCLK) frequency
> is obtained by dividing LCD_CLK, the LCD controller reference clock,
> for CLKDIV:
>
> Il 17/03/2021 09:19 Tomi Valkeinen ha scritto:
>
>
> On 14/03/2021 17:13, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > As reported by TI spruh73x RM, the LCD pixel clock (LCD_PCLK) frequency
> > is obtained by dividing LCD_CLK, the LCD controller reference clock,
> > for CLKDIV:
> >
> > LCD_PCLK = LCD_CLK /
On 14/03/2021 17:13, Dario Binacchi wrote:
As reported by TI spruh73x RM, the LCD pixel clock (LCD_PCLK) frequency
is obtained by dividing LCD_CLK, the LCD controller reference clock,
for CLKDIV:
LCD_PCLK = LCD_CLK / CLKDIV
where CLKDIV must be greater than 1.
Therefore LCD_CLK must be set to
As reported by TI spruh73x RM, the LCD pixel clock (LCD_PCLK) frequency
is obtained by dividing LCD_CLK, the LCD controller reference clock,
for CLKDIV:
LCD_PCLK = LCD_CLK / CLKDIV
where CLKDIV must be greater than 1.
Therefore LCD_CLK must be set to 'req_rate * CLKDIV' instead of req_rate
and t
