On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 04:09:56PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> drm_gem_object_unreference() now expects obj->dev->struct_mutex to be
>> held. Use the newly-introduced drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked()
>> which handles locking for u
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 04:09:56PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> drm_gem_object_unreference() now expects obj->dev->struct_mutex to be
> held. Use the newly-introduced drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked()
> which handles locking for us.
This rule has been really old, I simply made the checkin
drm_gem_object_unreference() now expects obj->dev->struct_mutex to be
held. Use the newly-introduced drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked()
which handles locking for us.
If we don't do this drm_gem_object_unreference() will get noisy about
struct_mutex not being held every time we call the SET_TILI
