On 09.04.2014 15:39, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding
>
> The version of the drm_tegra_submit structure that was merged all the
> way back in 3.10 contains a pad field that was originally intended to
> properly pad the following __u64 field. Unfortunately it seems like a
> different f
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:44:42PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> cc: stable to make sure that even once you release userspace you won't
> get angry bug reports?
Yes, good point. I was just pondering whether doing that would be smart
or not. But I came to the same conclusion.
Thierry
> -Daniel
>
cc: stable to make sure that even once you release userspace you won't
get angry bug reports?
-Daniel
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding
>
> The version of the drm_tegra_submit structure that was merged all the
> way back in 3.10 contains a pad field th
From: Thierry Reding
The version of the drm_tegra_submit structure that was merged all the
way back in 3.10 contains a pad field that was originally intended to
properly pad the following __u64 field. Unfortunately it seems like a
different field was dropped during review that caused this padding
