On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:22 PM, David Herrmann
wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:44:15PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Thomas Wood
>>> wrote:
>>> > It was intended as a debug/testing feature to al
Hi
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:44:15PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Thomas Wood
>> wrote:
>> > It was intended as a debug/testing feature to allow tests in
>> > intel-gpu-tools to enable or disable connec
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:44:15PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Thomas Wood wrote:
> > On 19 May 2014 15:13, David Herrmann wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Wood
> >> wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Wood
> >>
> >> Th
Hi
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Thomas Wood wrote:
> On 19 May 2014 15:13, David Herrmann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Wood
>> wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Wood
>>
>> The commit-msg lacks any discussion why this change is done. What is
>> the reason to do
Hi
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Wood wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Wood
The commit-msg lacks any discussion why this change is done. What is
the reason to do that? Isn't the kernel-command-line enough? Why is
this a regular feature instead of a debugfs attribute?
> ---
> drivers/g
On 19 May 2014 15:13, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Wood wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Wood
>
> The commit-msg lacks any discussion why this change is done. What is
> the reason to do that? Isn't the kernel-command-line enough? Why is
> this a regular f
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wood
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c | 49 +
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c
index c22c309..257816e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu
