[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-27 Thread Alex Deucher
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 15:12 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andy Walls >> wrote: >> > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher >> >> wrote: >> >> >

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-27 Thread Alex Deucher
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 15:12 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andy Walls wrote: >> > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher >> >> wrote: >> >> > On

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-26 Thread Andy Walls
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 15:12 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andy Walls > wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls > >> > wrote:

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-26 Thread Andy Walls
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 15:12 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls > >> > wrote: >

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-24 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls >> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> >>> 2

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-24 Thread Alex Deucher
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls >> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> >>> 2010/

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Jon Smirl
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls >> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> >>> 2

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Andy Walls
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > >>> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : > >>> > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Andy Walls
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 08:31 -0400, Andy Walls wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 01:30 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > It appears to be incorrect. If you send me a copy of the vbios, I can > > easily add a quirk. I suspect your board oem may offer several boards > > with different output configuration

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Jon Smirl
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls >> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> >>> 2010/

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Andy Walls
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > >> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > >>> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : > >>> > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Raf

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Andy Walls
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 08:31 -0400, Andy Walls wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 01:30 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > It appears to be incorrect. If you send me a copy of the vbios, I can > > easily add a quirk. I suspect your board oem may offer several boards > > with different output configuration

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Florian Mickler
[cc'd chris wilson] Hi Andy! On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:02:30 -0400 Andy Walls wrote: > BTW, I found that Chris Wilson recently committed a change to inhibit > all drm connector polling globally for a different reason: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e5

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Jon Smirl
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls > wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : >>> > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: >>> >> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : >>> >> > DR

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Andy Walls
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 11:44 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote: > [cc'd chris wilson] Oops. Thanks! > Hi Andy! > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:02:30 -0400 > Andy Walls wrote: > > > BTW, I found that Chris Wilson recently committed a change to inhibit > > all drm connector polling globally for a differen

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Andy Walls
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 01:30 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls > wrote: > > In a larger sense it's about user policy for error reporting by the drm > > and radeon drivers, and error response by both the drivers and the user. > > > > In the face of EDID error

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Jon Smirl
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : >>> > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> >> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : >>> >> > DRM K

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Andy Walls
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 11:44 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote: > [cc'd chris wilson] Oops. Thanks! > Hi Andy! > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:02:30 -0400 > Andy Walls wrote: > > > BTW, I found that Chris Wilson recently committed a change to inhibit > > all drm connector polling globally for a differen

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Andy Walls
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 01:30 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > > In a larger sense it's about user policy for error reporting by the drm > > and radeon drivers, and error response by both the drivers and the user. > > > > In the face of EDID errors,

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Florian Mickler
[cc'd chris wilson] Hi Andy! On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:02:30 -0400 Andy Walls wrote: > BTW, I found that Chris Wilson recently committed a change to inhibit > all drm connector polling globally for a different reason: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e5

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-22 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : >> > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: >> >> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : >> >> > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-21 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : >> > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> >> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : >> >> > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-21 Thread Andy Walls
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : > > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: > >> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : > >> > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or > >> > polling of "connectors" that have chips responding

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-21 Thread Alex Deucher
2010/9/20 Andy Walls : > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: >> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : >> > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or >> > polling of "connectors" that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus >> > address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical co

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-20 Thread Alex Deucher
2010/9/20 Andy Walls : > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : >> > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or >> > polling of "connectors" that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus >> > address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical co

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-20 Thread Rafał Miłecki
2010/9/20 Andy Walls : > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or > polling of "connectors" that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus > address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical connector nor EDID EEPROM, > will create perpetual noise in dmesg and the system log every 10 >

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-20 Thread Andy Walls
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: > 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : > > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or > > polling of "connectors" that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus > > address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical connector nor EDID EEPROM, > >

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-20 Thread Andy Walls
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 11:52 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:59:00AM -0400, Andy Walls wrote: > > This change allows the root user to disable (and re-enable) DRM KMS > > connector polling on a per connector basis via sysfs, like so: > > > > # cat /sys/class/drm/card0/car

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-20 Thread Andy Walls
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:29 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > 2010/9/20 Andy Walls : > > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or > > polling of "connectors" that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus > > address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical connector nor EDID EEPROM, > >

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-20 Thread Andy Walls
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 11:52 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:59:00AM -0400, Andy Walls wrote: > > This change allows the root user to disable (and re-enable) DRM KMS > > connector polling on a per connector basis via sysfs, like so: > > > > # cat /sys/class/drm/card0/ca

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-20 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:59:00AM -0400, Andy Walls wrote: > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or > polling of "connectors" that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus > address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical connector nor EDID EEPROM, > will create perpetual noise i

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-20 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:59:00AM -0400, Andy Walls wrote: > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or > polling of "connectors" that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus > address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical connector nor EDID EEPROM, > will create perpetual noise i

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-20 Thread Rafał Miłecki
2010/9/20 Andy Walls : > DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or > polling of "connectors" that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus > address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical connector nor EDID EEPROM, > will create perpetual noise in dmesg and the system log every 10 >

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-20 Thread Andy Walls
DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or polling of "connectors" that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical connector nor EDID EEPROM, will create perpetual noise in dmesg and the system log every 10 seconds. Currently the user has

[PATCH] drm/sysfs: Provide per connector control of DRM KMS polling

2010-09-20 Thread Andy Walls
DRM KMS polling of connections providing errant EDID responses, or polling of "connectors" that have chips responding on DDC I2C bus address 0xA0/0xA1 with no actual physical connector nor EDID EEPROM, will create perpetual noise in dmesg and the system log every 10 seconds. Currently the user has