Salut,
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 07:15:45AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 02/11/2016 à 19:14, Maxime Ripard a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 12:53:02PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > BTW, memory allocation in 'sun4i_layers_init()' looks spurious, especially
> > >
Le 02/11/2016 à 19:14, Maxime Ripard a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 12:53:02PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> BTW, memory allocation in 'sun4i_layers_init()' looks spurious, especially
>> the use of 'layer' in the for loop.
>> Just my 2 cents.
> What do you mean by it's spurious
Hi,
BTW, memory allocation in 'sun4i_layers_init()' looks spurious,
especially the use of 'layer' in the for loop.
Just my 2 cents.
I also forgot to say that we could propagate the error code returned by
sun4i_layers_init instead of returning -EINVAL unconditionally
CJ
Le 30/10/2016 Ã 09
'sun4i_layers_init()' returns an error pointer in case of error, not
NULL. So test it with IS_ERR.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET
---
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_drv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_drv.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4