On Monday 18 April 2016 12:02:35 Vincent ABRIOU wrote:
>
> getrawmonotonic comes from a legacy code so the use is not intentional.
> Honestly, it is not clear to me the difference between monotonic and
> rawmonotonic. But in the debug context in which it is used, ktime_get
> and ktime_get_raw wi
On 04/17/2016 01:39 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 April 2016 02:28:02 Tina Ruchandani wrote:
>> 'struct timespec' uses a 32-bit field for seconds, which
>> will overflow in year 2038 and beyond. This patch is part
>> of a larger attempt to remove instances of timeval, timespec
>> and t
On Wednesday 13 April 2016 02:28:02 Tina Ruchandani wrote:
> 'struct timespec' uses a 32-bit field for seconds, which
> will overflow in year 2038 and beyond. This patch is part
> of a larger attempt to remove instances of timeval, timespec
> and time_t, all of which suffer from the y2038 issue, fr
'struct timespec' uses a 32-bit field for seconds, which
will overflow in year 2038 and beyond. This patch is part
of a larger attempt to remove instances of timeval, timespec
and time_t, all of which suffer from the y2038 issue, from the
kernel.
Signed-off-by: Tina Ruchandani
---
drivers/gpu/dr
