On 11/15/2018 12:33 AM, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Am 14.11.18 um 18:29 schrieb Sharat Masetty:
On 11/8/2018 8:11 PM, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Am 08.11.18 um 14:42 schrieb Sharat Masetty:
Hi Christian,
Can you please review this patch? It is a continuation of the
discussion at [1].
At first
Am 14.11.18 um 18:29 schrieb Sharat Masetty:
>
>
> On 11/8/2018 8:11 PM, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Am 08.11.18 um 14:42 schrieb Sharat Masetty:
>>> Hi Christian,
>>>
>>> Can you please review this patch? It is a continuation of the
>>> discussion at [1].
>>> At first I was thinking of using a ca
On 11/8/2018 8:11 PM, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Am 08.11.18 um 14:42 schrieb Sharat Masetty:
Hi Christian,
Can you please review this patch? It is a continuation of the discussion at [1].
At first I was thinking of using a cancel for suspend instead of a mod(to an
arbitrarily large value), but
Am 08.11.18 um 14:42 schrieb Sharat Masetty:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Can you please review this patch? It is a continuation of the discussion at
> [1].
> At first I was thinking of using a cancel for suspend instead of a mod(to an
> arbitrarily large value), but I couldn't get it to fit in as I have a
Hi Christian,
Can you please review this patch? It is a continuation of the discussion at [1].
At first I was thinking of using a cancel for suspend instead of a mod(to an
arbitrarily large value), but I couldn't get it to fit in as I have an
additional
constraint of being able to call these func
