On 13/04/2015 02:42, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Martin Peres wrote:
>> On 05/02/2015 11:49, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 04.02.2015 um 23:27 schrieb Alex Deucher:
0-255 seems to be the preferred range for the pwm interface.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Martin Peres wrote:
> On 05/02/2015 11:49, Christian König wrote:
>>
>> Am 04.02.2015 um 23:27 schrieb Alex Deucher:
>>>
>>> 0-255 seems to be the preferred range for the pwm interface.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
>>
>> Yeah, using 100 on a 8bit pwm timer
On 05/02/2015 11:49, Christian König wrote:
> Am 04.02.2015 um 23:27 schrieb Alex Deucher:
>> 0-255 seems to be the preferred range for the pwm interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
> Yeah, using 100 on a 8bit pwm timer sounds rather obviously wrong.
>
> Patch is Reviewed-by: Christian Kö
Am 04.02.2015 um 23:27 schrieb Alex Deucher:
> 0-255 seems to be the preferred range for the pwm interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Yeah, using 100 on a 8bit pwm timer sounds rather obviously wrong.
Patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c | 8
0-255 seems to be the preferred range for the pwm interface.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
index 91e1bd2..9f75