On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:57:01AM -0400, alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Christian König
>
> Only increase the higher 32bits if we really detect a wrap around.
>
> v2: instead of increasing the higher 32bits just use the higher
> 32bits from the last emitted fence.
> v3: also use last
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:57:01AM -0400, alexdeucher at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Christian K?nig
>
> Only increase the higher 32bits if we really detect a wrap around.
>
> v2: instead of increasing the higher 32bits just use the higher
> 32bits from the last emitted fence.
> v3: also use la
From: Christian K?nig
Only increase the higher 32bits if we really detect a wrap around.
v2: instead of increasing the higher 32bits just use the higher
32bits from the last emitted fence.
v3: also use last emitted fence value as upper limit.
The intention of this patch is to make fences as
From: Christian König
Only increase the higher 32bits if we really detect a wrap around.
v2: instead of increasing the higher 32bits just use the higher
32bits from the last emitted fence.
v3: also use last emitted fence value as upper limit.
The intention of this patch is to make fences as